Navigating Rehabilitation’s Role in Patient Navigation

Illustration by Sherry An for rehabINK.

Commentary

By Kristina Marie Kokorelias


When you or someone you love is faced with an illness or injury, navigating the maze of our healthcare system is enough to distract from the goal of simply getting better. Transitioning across healthcare settings, where patients are moving across care settings and providers, often take place from hospitals to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (1), outpatient centers, or even home (2-4). Experiencing this tumultuous trajectory can be jarring for patients and their family caregivers (5), leading to sub-optimal outcomes (e.g., increased hospital re-admissions, being discharged to long-term care instead of home when being home is preferred), and may go against patient values who may prefer to age at home (6-8). Incorporating rehabilitation services from the point of diagnosis throughout the care trajectory, and potential care transition settings, for many patient populations is needed to improve cognitive and functional outcomes (15-17).

01_1
Luis Melendez (Unsplash)

Rehabilitation care is uniquely situated within the healthcare system, given the focus on the return of function, health and wellbeing (15). Given how common transitions are during the course of someone’s illness or injury, strategies that improve care transitions from acute care hospitals to complex continuing care and rehabilitation are encouraged. This article will demonstrate the role rehabilitation experts have in advancing patient navigation to help improve the integration of rehabilitation earlier into the healthcare trajectory.

While individuals benefit from rehabilitation early in the course of their recovery (1), gaps often occur during transitions in care that result in persons not accessing timely rehabilitation services.

While individuals benefit from rehabilitation early in the course of their recovery (1), gaps often occur during transitions in care that result in persons not accessing timely rehabilitation services. The reasons for this include a lack of knowledge, limited access to services, or difficulty with program adherence (9,10) (e.g., due to transportation or scheduling barriers (11,12)). At the same time, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has increased the number of patients who will require specialized rehabilitation services (13). COVID-19 may exacerbate the challenges patients face when navigating the healthcare system, such as when transitioning from acute care settings to rehabilitation, as services may be withdrawn or unavailable for some patient groups (e.g., the shift to virtual care) (14,18). Strategies to improve access to rehabilitation care early in the care trajectory are therefore encouraged (19).

Calls have been made from the World Health Organization to strengthen the linkages between acute care and rehabilitation care, but the uptake of this concept is slow due to the lack of integration between different care settings (17). Therefore, novel models of care are needed to increase uptake of necessary rehabilitation; contributing to improved patient outcomes. Patient navigation is emerging as a patient-centered care strategy to reduce barriers to care, such as improving access to rehabilitation.

Patient navigation is emerging as a patient-centered care strategy to reduce barriers to care, such as improving access to rehabilitation.

Patient-centered care is defined as a model of care that considers patients’ unique experiences of illness and the active collaboration and shared care decision-making between patients and care providers (19). Patient navigation programs first emerged in Canada to reduce barriers to care and improve the integration of care in the context of cancer (20), but have since evolved to meet the needs of patients with a variety of health conditions, including diabetes, dementia, and cardiovascular disease (21). Patient navigators are designed to ensure equitable access to care and assist with timely access to and coordination of care services for patients transitioning between care settings (22-24). Patient navigators may be lay navigators (i.e., peers with lived experience) or professional navigators (i.e., trained professionals).

Multiple professions could serve as professional navigators with them most often being nurses, social workers, or counsellors (25,26) and the scope of practice varying. However, the patient navigators assisting with access to rehabilitation is scarcely mentioned in recent the literature, (26) except in a few studies focused solely on individuals with cancer (27) and stroke (28).

As members of multidisciplinary healthcare teams, rehabilitation clinicians (i.e., clinicians working in a rehabilitation setting such as physiotherapists) have a well-defined role in supporting the health and well-being of individuals with illness and disability across various settings of care. Similarly, rehabilitation clinicians have the expertise to manage the care of patients throughout various stages of illness and injury trajectories.  Scholars have argued that when the patient navigator role is incorporated into rehabilitation settings, professional navigators could improve the assessment and management of functional impairment and reintegration to meaningful occupations in individuals with injury or illness (27,29,30).

Filling whole system patient navigator roles with rehabilitation clinicians could expand the capability of patient navigation by providing the patient access to a healthcare provider with expertise in clinical assessments focused on rehabilitation and reintegration into the community (27). In comparison to lay navigators, rehabilitation clinicians would be able to provide clinical assessments to tailor care plans and service referrals to each patient’s and family member’s needs. Rehabilitation clinicians also have a unique focus on independence, participation, quality of life that other clinicians may not have, making them well-versed in caring for diverse patient populations within the specialty of rehabilitation medicine.

Incorporating more rehabilitation clinicians as patient navigators could result in numerous opportunities for clinical assessments that could assist with the goals of rehabilitation and may improve patient outcomes. Moreover, rehabilitation clinicians often already utilize the service navigation aspects of their roles (e.g., referral to other providers/services, help clients and families understand rationale for rehabilitation therapy) and therefore have the capacity and skills to contribute to patient navigation programs as they continue to be implemented across Canada. Rehabilitation clinicians are also well suited to perform other functions of patient navigation including assisting with patient goal setting (31), self management (26) as well as providing emotional support and education. Lastly, clinicians would also have an intimate knowing of the rehabilitation system accompanied by existing relationship with other care providers.

At the same time, non-clinical rehabilitation professions (i.e.., administrators and researchers) could have an important role supporting patient navigator programs to advocate for improvements to navigating health systems. Specifically, non-clinical rehabilitation professionals can assist with developing awareness of the patient navigator role among rehabilitation clinicians. Rehabilitation scientists can lead research to help define and evaluate the role of patient navigators in research. For instance, qualitative research could be conducted to identify the patient navigation health system needs of patients and their caregivers. Likewise, intervention and evaluation research is warranted on the effectiveness of different types of program models (i.e., lay vs professional navigators) and clinicians in navigator roles on outcomes of navigation in rehabilitation settings. Research should support the optimal scope of patient navigators across health and social care and community settings to promote health and well-being. Lessons learned from the design, implementation, and evaluation of the rehabilitation patient navigator role could have implications for future health systems policy development.

01_2
Edward Jenner (Pexels)

In addition to in-person healthcare, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase in virtual care. Rehabilitation clinicians and researchers can lead the expansion of virtual patient navigation. Virtual patient navigation systems have been defined as a web or mobile application that provides reliable health information and timely access to services (32). Existing studies have shown the positive impact of virtual patient navigation for patients’ across the care trajectory, although not specific to the rehabilitation journey (33-35). Rehabilitation clinicians, with their experience caring for patients through virtual means, could help inform the development of a virtual patient navigator program. Rehabilitation researchers could help to evaluate the impact of a virtual rehabilitation patient navigator program.

Many patients requiring rehabilitation often have multi-dimensional (i.e., mixed physical, emotional and psychosocial) healthcare needs, necessitating transitions across different settings and providers of care.

Many patients requiring rehabilitation often have multi-dimensional (i.e., mixed physical, emotional and psychosocial) healthcare needs, necessitating transitions across different settings and providers of care. Unfortunately, Canada’s healthcare system is distinctively complex and the lack of coordination amongst providers can lead to navigational challenges that often results in individuals having poor outcomes following a care transition.

Patient navigation has emerged as a method to help with system coordination and access. However, patient navigation is slow to emerge in the context of rehabilitation. The concept of patient navigation has the potential to improve access to rehabilitation care and consequently, health outcomes (36-38). Consequently, rehabilitation clinicians and researchers should be encouraged to assist with the implementation of patient navigator programs within rehabilitation delivery systems. Rehabilitation patient navigators can help patients and family members adapt to new healthcare settings and dysfunctions in the rehabilitation systems and in the broader healthcare system. As high-quality care for individuals with illness or disability is often multi-faceted, patient navigation may not the ‘be-all-end-all’, but it may not be a bad place for rehabilitation to start.

Acknowledgements

Featured illustration by Sherry Ann for rehabINK.

To refer to this article, it can be cited as:

Kokorelias KM. Navigating Rehabilitations Role in Patient Navigation. rehabINK. 2021:11. Available from: https://rehabinkmag.com


References

  1. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006-17.
  2. Fehlings MG, Noonan VK, Atkins D, Burns AS, Cheng CL, Singh A, et al. Optimizing Clinical Decision Making in Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2017;34(20):2841-2.
  3. McGilton KS, Chu CH, Naglie G, van Wyk PM, Stewart S, Davis AM. Factors Influencing Outcomes of Older Adults After Undergoing Rehabilitation for Hip Fracture. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2016;64(8):1601-9.
  4. Rice D, Janzen S, McIntyre A, Vermeer J, Britt E, Teasell R. Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Program: Hospital-Based Stroke Outpatient Rehabilitation. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2016;25(5):1158-64.
  5. Fillion L, Cook S, Veillette AM, Aubin M, de Serres M, Rainville F, et al. Professional navigation framework: elaboration and validation in a Canadian context. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2012;39(1):E58-69.
  6. Albrecht JS, Gruber-Baldini AL, Hirshon JM, Brown CH, Goldberg R, Rosenberg JH, et al. Hospital discharge instructions: comprehension and compliance among older adults. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014;29(11):1491-8.
  7. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;138(3):161-7.
  8. Walker D. Caring For Our Aging Population and Addressing Alternate Level of Care. 2011.
  9. Stubblefield MD. The underutilization of rehabilitation to treat physical impairments in breast cancer survivors. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017;9(9):S317-S23.
  10. Schatz P, Hughes LJ, Chute DL. Underutilization of neuropsychology in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Is managed care to blame? NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(4):281-7.
  11. Eldar R, Kullmann L, Marincek C, Sekelj-Kauzlarić K, Švestkova O, Palat M. Rehabilitation medicine in countries of Central/Eastern Europe. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2008;30(2):134-41.
  12. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, McGee H, Zwisler A-D, Piepoli MF, Benzer W, Schmid J-P, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European cardiac rehabilitation inventory survey. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2010;17(4):410-8.
  13. De Biase S, Cook L, Skelton DA, Witham M, Ten Hove R. The COVID-19 rehabilitation pandemic. Age and Ageing. 2020;49(5):696-700.
  14. Chandran N. Equity in Access and Use of Rehabilitation Services in Canada. rehabINK. 2021.
  15. Cheville AL, McLaughlin SA, Haddad TC, Lyons KD, Newman R, Ruddy KJ. Integrated rehabilitation for breast cancer survivors. American Journal of Physical medicine & Rehabilitation. 2019;98(2):154-64.
  16. Barbeau H, Fung J. The role of rehabilitation in the recovery of walking in the neurological population. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2001;14(6):735-40.
  17. Gimigliano F, Negrini S. The World Health Organization” rehabilitation 2030: a call for action”. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;53(2):155-68.
  18. Pan American Health Organization. Rehabilitation considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. Available at: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52035/NMHMHCOVID19200010_eng.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
  19. Yun D, Choi J. Person-centered rehabilitation care and outcomes: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019 May 1;93:74-83.
  20. Fillion L, Cook S, Veillette A-M, Aubin M, De Serres M, Rainville F, et al., editors. Professional navigation framework: elaboration and validation in a Canadian context. Oncology Nursing Forum; 2012.
  21. McBrien KA, Ivers N, Barnieh L, Bailey JJ, Lorenzetti DL, Nicholas D, et al. Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191980.
  22. Brown N, Vaughn NA, Lin AJ, Browne R, White M, Smith P. Healthy families Brooklyn: working with health advocates to develop a health promotion program for residents living in New York City housing authority developments. Journal of Community Health. 2011;36(5):864-73.
  23. Gimpel N, Marcee A, Kennedy K, Walton J, Lee S, DeHaven MJ. Patient perceptions of a community-based care coordination system. Health Promotion Practice. 2010;11(2):173-81.
  24. Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, Garcia R, Greene A, Calhoun E, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008;113(8):1999-2010.
  25. Reid AE, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the role of lay and professional patient navigators in Canada. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2020;25(4):229-37.
  26. Kelly K, Doucet S, Luke A. Exploring the roles, functions, and background of patient navigators and case managers: a scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2019;98:27-47.
  27. Stout NL, Sleight A, Pfeiffer D, Galantino ML, deSouza B. Promoting assessment and management of function through navigation: opportunities to bridge oncology and rehabilitation systems of care. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019;27(12):4497-505.
  28. Egan M, Anderson S, McTaggart J. Community navigation for stroke survivors and their care partners: description and evaluation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2010;17(3):183-90.
  29. Jolly SE, Navaneethan SD, Schold JD, Arrigain S, Konig V, Burrucker YK, et al. Development of a chronic kidney disease patient navigator program. Biomed Central Nephrology. 2015;16(1):1-8.
  30. Iverson M, Ng AV, Yan AF, Zvara K, Bonk M, Falk-Palec D, et al. Navigator Role for Promoting Adaptive Sports and Recreation Participation in Individuals with Disabilities. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2020.
  31. Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2009;23(4):291-5.
  32. Haase, K.R., Loiselle, C.G.: Oncology team members’ perceptions of a virtual navigational tool for cancer patients. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 81(6), pp. 395-403 (2012)
  33. Daniel A. Rehab facilities face COVID-19 crunch as more patients recover. Canadian Medical Association; 2020.
  34. Roberge J, McWilliams A, Zhao J, Anderson WE, Hetherington T, Zazzaro C, et al. Effect of a Virtual Patient Navigation Program on Behavioral Health Admissions in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of American Medical Association. 2020;3(1):e1919954-e.
  35. Chandhoke GS, Grewal AS, Pathak V, Singh S, Ziabari MK, Amyot D, et al. A virtual patient navigation application for lung cancer assessment patients. International Conference on E-Technologies; 2017: Springer.
  36. Highfield L, Ottenweller C, Pfanz A, Hanks J. Interactive web-based portals to improve patient navigation and connect patients with primary care and specialty services in underserved communities. Perspectives in Health Information Management. 2014;11.
  37. Freeman HP, Rodriguez RL. History and principles of patient navigation. Cancer. 2011;117(S15):3537-40.
  38. Freeman HP. The history, principles, and future of patient navigation: commentary. Seminars in Oncology Nursing; 2013.