Stroke caregivers at risk for depression: Suggestions for rehabilitation professionals

Supporting hand of a family member for old and disabled grandfather.

MINI REVIEW

By Kristina Kokorelias


 

Stroke is a leading cause of disability among adults (1). The majority of individuals with stroke return to the community with physical and/or cognitive impairments, and rely on family members to support everyday activities (2). Informal caregivers are an extremely valuable resource, and their support often allows individuals with stroke to remain in their homes, rather than residing in institutionalized care settings (3). Caregivers also play an important role in promoting successful rehabilitation outcomes (2-4).

Unfortunately, existing literature suggests caregivers are at risk for poor mental health outcomes (3). Because of caregiving, many report significant disruptions to their social life, leisure time, and emotional health (2,5). These lifestyle changes are related to fatigue, distress, and decreased quality of life (2,3). Therefore, caregivers are at risk of experiencing high emotional distress (3).

The body of literature discussing stroke caregivers’ mental health has continued to grow. As a result, rehabilitation clinicians and scientists can make clinical recommendations from a vast amount of literature on the factors associated with depression in stroke caregivers.

Factors associated with Depressive Symptoms in Stroke Caregivers

A wide range of factors have been associated with depressive symptoms in stroke caregivers. These include feeling burdened by the caregiving role (6), and interference with valued life activities (7,8) such as volunteering. In addition, caregiver characteristics, such as having a high sense of personal mastery including feeling competent completing care tasks, are associated with fewer depressive symptoms (7-9). However, it is unclear if other factors such as caregivers’ general health status (7), feeling socially supported (10-13), and depression after stroke (14), are significantly associated with caregiver depression. The current evidence base may enable rehabilitation professionals to identify caregivers who are at risk for depression and who may need additional support from our rehabilitation health and social care systems.

Suggestions for Rehabilitation Professionals

Caregiver burden has been identified as a risk factor for caregiver depression (15). Burden is a term broadly used to describe the stress experienced by caregivers as a result of their role. This burden includes psychological, emotional, physical, and sociological results of stress (15). It is recommended that rehabilitation science researchers conduct future research to focus on clearly defined components of burden that most affect caregivers’ levels of depressive symptoms. This research would also help clinicians target specific support interventions for caregivers who experience types of burden (i.e., financial). Moreover, clinicians are also encouraged to educate caregivers on ways to reduce the risk of caregiver burden. Clinicians frequently interact with caregivers during the stroke rehabilitation process. Therefore, clinicians also have a responsibility to recognize and be aware of changes in mood that caregivers experience while caring for their loved one.

Caregiving for an individual with a stroke may cause a disruption in the caregiver’s routine way of living, and can result in significant lifestyle disruptions to the caregiver. Decreased participation in valued activities because of caregiving was found to be a risk factor for caregiver depression (7,8). Caregivers’ limited ability to participate in valued activities can result in emotional distress. This finding has been consistently reported in the literature among cancer (16,17) and dementia caregivers (18). Thus, it is recommended that clinicians support stroke caregivers’ participation in valued activities. This recommendation has important implications for caregivers’ mental health and their capacity to continue providing care to individuals with stroke. For example, it is within the scope of occupational therapy practice to educate caregivers on available community respite services that may allow caregivers the time to participate in valued activities while providing a break from caregiving.

Furthermore, a high sense of personal mastery is associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms in stroke caregivers. Mastery can be described as an individual’s sense of control over difficult caregiving circumstances (19). In the context of stroke caregiving, caregivers with a high sense of mastery may be better able to use a problem-focused approach, which focuses on targeting the causes of stress (20,21), when faced with such challenges.

For example, caregivers with low mastery may ask rehabilitation health care professionals for social support and additional information on stroke rehabilitation to help increase their feelings of mastery. In those who care for people with dementia, a higher degree of personal mastery reduces the effects of depressive symptoms (22). It is plausible stroke caregivers may experience a similar result. By improving mastery and promoting a balanced lifestyle, clinicians can support stroke caregivers and decrease the risk of poor mental health outcomes.

Another way rehabilitation clinicians can improve mastery in caregivers is by encouraging them to work together with the rehabilitation team. This may help the caregiver and clinicians work toward finding realistic solutions that the caregiver can sustain on their own. The cooperation of all members is advantageous to the rehabilitation process for supporting caregivers, and to help improve patient outcomes. For example, including caregivers in the rehabilitation process might help to clarify goals of care aligned with the values of the individual with stroke and their family. Moreover, education should be provided to caregivers through ongoing communication with the rehabilitation team, so that they feel better prepared to care for their loved one at home. For example, physical therapists should adequately educate caregivers in the rehabilitation exercises they want the individual with stroke to perform outside of the clinic, hospital, or skilled nursing facility. Rehabilitation scientists are encouraged to research ways to improve the sense of personal mastery in stroke caregivers.

In conclusion, this article has highlighted some key factors associated with depressive symptoms in caregivers and provided suggestions for how to mitigate these symptoms.  Caregivers who experience burden and interference with participation in valued activities, and who have low personal mastery, are more likely to report higher levels of depressive symptoms (7,8). Rehabilitation professionals are encouraged to be educated on these factors so that they may help identify stroke caregivers at risk for poor mental health outcomes. This will also support rehabilitation professionals to allocate health resources efficiently that can help support stroke caregivers. Rehabilitation professionals, including both clinical practitioners and researchers, are in a unique position to help support stroke caregivers’ well-being. By supporting caregiver well-being and potentially reducing the risk of depressive symptoms through suggestions outlined in this article, rehabilitation professionals can assist caregivers in delivering the highest quality care to their family member affected by stroke.


References

  1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28-292.
  2. Anderson C, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne EG. A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke. 1995,26:843-849.
  3. Low JTS, Payne S, Roderick P. The impact of stroke on informal carers: A literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:711-725.
  4. Evans RL, Connis RT, Bishop DS, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK. Stroke: a family dilemma. Disabil Rehabil. 1994;16:110-118.
  5. Grigorovich A, Forde S, Levinson D, Bastawrous M, Cheung AM, Cameron JI. Restricted Participation in Stroke Caregivers: Who Is at Risk?. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2015;96:1284-1290.
  6. Denno MS, Gillard PJ, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Goren A, Varon, SF, et al. Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2013;94(9):731-1736.
  7. Cameron JI, Cheung AM, Streiner DL, Coyte PC, Stewart DE. Stroke survivor depressive symptoms are associated with family caregiver depression during the first 2 years poststroke. 2011;42:302-306.
  8. Cameron JI, Stewart DE, Streiner DL, Coyte PC, Cheung AM. What makes family caregivers happy during the first 2 years post stroke?. Stroke. 2014;45:1084-1089.
  9. Cameron JI, Cheung AM, Streiner DL, Coyte PC, Stewart DE. Stroke survivors’ behavioral and psychologic symptoms are associated with informal caregivers’ experiences of depression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:177-183.
  10. Lui MH, Lee DT, Greenwood N, Ross FM. Informal stroke caregivers’ self-appraised problem-solving abilities as a predictor of well-being and perceived social support. Journal of Clinical Nursing.2012;21(1-2):232-242.
  11. Grant JS, Bartolucci AA, Elliot TR, Giger JN. Sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial characteristics of depressed and non-depressed family caregivers of stroke survivors. Brain Injury. 2000;14(12):1089-1100.
  12. Grant JS, Elliott, TR, Giger JN, Bartolucci AA. Social problem-solving abilities, social support, and adjustment among family caregivers of individuals with a stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2001;46(1):44-57.
  13. Grant JS, Elliott TR, Weaver M, Glandon GL, Raper JL, Giger JN. Social support, social problem-solving abilities, and adjustment of family caregivers of stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2006;87(3):343-350.
  14. Lau CG, Tang WK, Wong KS, Mok V, Ungvari GS. Predictors of the depressive symptomatology of the family caregivers of Chinese stroke patients in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing.2012;19(4):285-293.
  15. Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Journal of Social Work Education. 2008 Sep 1;44(sup3):105-13.
  16. Cameron JI, Franche RL, Cheung AM, Stewart DE. Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. 2002;94:521-527.
  17. Mausbach BT, Chattillion EA, Moore RC, Roepke SK, Depp CA, Roesch S. Activity restriction and depression in medical patients and their caregivers: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:900-908.
  18. Mausbach BT, Patterson TL, Grant I. Is depression in Alzheimer’s caregivers really due to activity restriction? A preliminary mediational test of the Activity Restriction Model. J Behav Ther Exp Psy. 2008;39:459-466.
  19. Skaff MM, Pearlin LI, Mullan JT. Transitions in the caregiving career: effects on sense of mastery. Psychol Aging. 1996;11:247-257.
  20. Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs. 1986.
  21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan; 1997 Feb 15.
  22. Mausbach BT, Patterson TL, Känel RV, Mills PJ, Dimsdale JE, Ancoli-Israel S, et al. The attenuating effect of personal mastery on the relations between stress and Alzheimer caregiver health: a five-year longitudinal analysis. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11:637-644.